Form 425

Filed by Yellow Corporation

Pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act of 1933

and deemed filed pursuant to Rule 14a-12 and Rule 14d-2(b)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

Subject Company: Yellow Corporation

Commission File No.: 0-12255

 

Subject Company: Roadway Corporation

Commission File No.: 000-32821

 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements made herein contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The words “expect,” “will,” “look forward to” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements.

 

The expectations set forth in this filing regarding accretion, returns on invested capital, achievement of annual savings and synergies, achievement of strong cash flow, sufficiency of cash flow to fund capital expenditures and achievement of debt reduction targets are only the parties’ expectations regarding these matters. Actual results could differ materially from these expectations depending on factors such as the combined company’s cost of capital, the ability of the combined company to identify and implement cost savings, synergies and efficiencies in the time frame needed to achieve these expectations, prior contractual commitments of the combined companies and their ability to terminate these commitments or amend, renegotiate or settle the same, the combined company’s actual capital needs, the absence of any material incident of property damage or other hazard that could affect the need to effect capital expenditures, any unforeseen merger or acquisition opportunities that could affect capital needs, the costs incurred in implementing synergies and the factors that generally affect both Yellow’s and Roadway’s respective businesses as further outlined in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in each of the companies’ respective Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 and the “Risk Factors” outlined in Yellow’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 4, 2003. Yellow’s plans regarding the maintenance of the separate Yellow and Roadway brands and networks, the continuation of the Roadway headquarters as a major operational center, the focus on administrative and back office synergies and workforce rationalizations are only its current plans and intentions regarding these matters. Actual actions that the combined company may take may differ from time to time as the combined company may deem necessary or advisable in the best interest of the combined company and its shareholders to attempt to achieve the successful integration of the companies, the synergies needed to make the transaction a financial success and to react to the economy and the combined company’s market for its transportation services.


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

 

Yellow and Roadway will file a proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents concerning the proposed merger transaction with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Investors are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus when it becomes available and any other relevant documents filed with the SEC because they will contain important information. You will be able to obtain the documents free of charge at the website maintained by the SEC at www.sec.gov. In addition, you may obtain documents filed with the SEC by Yellow free of charge by requesting them in writing from Yellow or by telephone at (913) 696-6100. You may obtain documents filed with the SEC by Roadway free of charge by requesting them in writing from Roadway or by telephone at (330) 384-1717. Yellow and Roadway, and their respective directors and executive officers, may be deemed to be participants in the solicitation of proxies from the stockholders of Yellow and Roadway in connection with the merger. Information about the directors and executive officers of Yellow and their ownership of Yellow stock is set forth in the proxy statement for Yellow’s 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Information about the directors and executive officers of Roadway and their ownership of Roadway stock is set forth in the proxy statement for Roadway’s 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Investors may obtain additional information regarding the interests of such participants by reading the proxy statement/prospectus when it becomes available.

 

The following documents are filed herewith pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act of 1933:

 

  Slide show presentation to investors and analysts on July 31, 2003 and subsequent dates.

 



LOGO

 

[LOGO] YELLOW CORPORATION®

 

Yellow Corporation

 

 

July 31, 2003

 

 

 

 

Making global commerce work by connecting people, places, and information.

 

1


LOGO

 

[LOGO] YELLOW CORPORATION®

 

Balancing yield and tonnage growth to

enhance profitability

 

[GRAPHIC] Yield and Tonnage Growth                    [GRAPHIC] Operating Income Growth

 

2


LOGO

 

[LOGO] YELLOW CORPORATION®                [LOGO] ROADWAY® CORPORATION

 

Yellow — Roadway Corporation

 

A Strategic Combination

 

Making global commerce work by connecting people, places, and information.

 

3


LOGO

 

[LOGO] YELLOW CORPORATION®

 

[LOGO] ROADWAY® CORPORATION

 

The Right Strategy, the Right Partner

 

n   Advances strategy
  n   Comprehensive portfolio of transportation services (‘one-stop shopping’)
  ·   Greater penetration of premium services
  ·   Non-asset solutions to larger base of customers
  ·   Next-day opportunities
  ·   Technology solutions for customers and operations

 

n   Continued investments in both companies’ brands
  n   Operate both networks separately
  ·   Not ‘crunching’ Yellow Transportation and Roadway Express together
  ·   Pre-empts labor and customer issues
  ·   Preserves brand equity
  n   Over time, differentiate the brands in the marketplace

 

4


LOGO

[LOGO] YELLOW CORPORATION®

 

ROADWAY® CORPORATION

 

The Right Strategy, the Right Partner (cont’d)

 

n   Enhanced Scale and Market Position
  n   Combined revenue of approximately $6 billion
  ·   Nearly 48,000 employees in over 700 locations
  n   Largest North American transportation company focused on big shipments for business
  n   Strong #3 position in ground-based transportation (UPS, FedEx)
  n   Large customer bases with limited overlap

 

 

5


LOGO

[LOGO] YELLOW CORPORATION®

 

ROADWAY® CORPORATION

 

The Right Time

 

n   Both companies are solidly profitable
n   5-year labor agreement
n   Favorable financial markets
n   Potential of economic recovery provides substantial upside from conservative base case
n   Roadway management team supportive of strategy

 

 

6


LOGO

[LOGO] YELLOW CORPORATION®

[LOGO] ROADWAY® CORPORATION

Mitigating the risks…

 

n   Customer retention
  n   Maintain high levels of service and quality with improvements from implementing best practices
  n   Key customer interfaces remain in place
  n   Ability to share the benefits of leveraging cost structure / investments across the larger organization
  n   Opportunity for customers to utilize additional service offerings of combined company
  n   Customer feedback to date has been very supportive of transaction
  ·   Senior management has held discussions with top 200 customers in each company
  n   We see July business volumes as strong

 

7


LOGO

[LOGO] YELLOW CORPORATION®

 

ROADWAY® CORPORATION

 

Mitigating the risks (cont’d)

 

n   Employee Retention / Union Relations
  n   Retaining key employees is a top priority
  n   Communication is the key
  ·   Both CEOs filmed joint video for staff of both companies
  ·   Presentations by senior and local leadership to dispel myths around transaction
  ·   Most employees taking comfort in fact that companies will operate independently
  n   James Staley, President & CEO of Roadway, will remain in his position at Roadway
  n   Sales and operations positions remain unchanged
  n   Both CEOs met with Teamsters’ Senior Management the day following the announcement in Washington, DC
  ·   Initial reaction is guarded optimism
  ·   Encouraged by fact that merger is not centered on large cost synergies from merging two networks, as has been case in past transportation industry mergers
  ·   Goal is to grow from a larger, stronger competitive position versus non-union companies

 

 

8


LOGO

 

[LOGO] YELLOW CORPORATION®

 

[LOGO] ROADWAY® CORPORATION

 

...While Capturing Meaningful Synergies

 

n   Approximately $30 million of cost synergies required to be accretive in 2004, which represents:

 

  n   Less than 0.5% of operating expenses
  n   Less than 1.6% of non-labor costs

 

n   Conservative case of $45 million in cost synergies

 

n   Total potential cost synergies exceed $125 million

 

n   Expect accretion within 12 months of closing

 

[GRAPHIC] Synergies (millions)

 

9


LOGO

 

[LOGO] YELLOW CORPORATION®

 

[LOGO] ROADWAY® CORPORATION

 

Projected synergies – conservative

 

Cumulative Conservative Savings by Year – in millions


     Year 1

   Year 2

   Year 3

   Year 4

   Year 5

   5-Year Total

Revenue impact +/-1%(1)

   $ 9.9    $ 10.4    $ 10.8    $ 10.3    $ 11.7    $ 54.1

Potential cost synergies

                                         

Operational

                                         

Mexico

   $ 0.5    $ 2.0    $ 2.0    $ 2.0    $ 2.0    $ 8.5

Canada

     2.0      5.0      5.0      5.0      5.0      22.0

Alaska, Puerto Rico & Hawaii

     1.1      2.0      2.0      2.0      2.0      9.1

Rail costs

     1.6      2.0      2.0      2.0      2.0      9.6

Expedited & cartage PTS

     1.3      2.0      2.0      2.0      2.0      9.3

Equipment & tire purchasing

     1.7      2.5      2.5      2.5      2.5      11.7

Shop costs & equipment pooling

     1.5      3.0      3.0      3.0      3.0      13.5

Exhibit services trailers

     1.1      1.5      1.5      1.5      1.5      7.1

Square states optimization

     0.0      0.0      1.0      2.0      2.0      5.0
    

  

  

  

  

  

       10.8      20.0      21.0      22.0      22.0      95.8
    

  

  

  

  

  

General and administrative

                                         

Information technology

     5.4      8.1      8.1      8.1      8.1      37.8

Other back office G&A

     9.3      13.2      13.9      13.9      13.9      64.2
    

  

  

  

  

  

       14.7      21.3      22.0      22.0      22.0      102.0
    

  

  

  

  

  

Total potential cost synergies

   $ 25.5    $ 41.3    $ 43.0    $ 44.0    $ 44.0    $ 197.8
    

  

  

  

  

  

 

(1)   Assumes 15% incremental margin.

 

10


LOGO

[LOGO] YELLOW CORPORATION®

 

[LOGO] ROADWAY® CORPORATION

 

Projected integration costs – conservative

 

Annual Costs of Integration by Year – in millions


     Year 1

   Year 2

   Year 3

   Year 4

   Year 5

   5-Year Total

Potential implementation costs

                                         

Severance (excluding executive triggers)

   $ 1.7    $ 0.6    $ 0.2                  $ 2.5

Stay bonuses

     4.0      2.0      1.0                    7.0

Communications

     2.0      1.0                           3.0

Other one-time costs (placeholder)

     5.0                                  5.0

Technology development

                                        0.0

Total potential implementation/one-time costs

     12.7      3.6      1.2      0.0      0.0      17.5
    

  

  

  

  

  

Net pre-tax synergies (excluding Capex)

     12.8      37.7      41.8    $ 44.0    $ 44.0      180.3
    

  

  

  

  

  

Non-IT capital expenditures (placeholder)

   $ 4.0    $ 4.0    $ 2.0                  $ 10.0

 

11


LOGO

[LOGO] YELLOW CORPORATION®

[LOGO] ROADWAY® CORPORATION

 

Longer-term potential synergies

 

n   Overview
  n   $5.8 billion of costs
  ·   Target 5% – 10% cost savings without impacting the customer
  n   Linehaul network
  ·   $2 billion annual expense
    10% savings achievable
  ·   Continued optimization of networks
    Reduced empty miles
    Reduced handling
  ·   Enterprise equipment balancing and optimization

 

 

12


LOGO

[LOGO] YELLOW CORPORATION®

ROADWAY® CORPORATION

 

Pro Forma Leverage

 

[GRAPHIC] Debt to EBITDA            [GRAPHIC] Debt to Capital

 

n   Both companies will continue to reduce debt between now and year-end
n   Strength of current balance sheets support transaction financing
n   Free cash flow generation allows for rapid debt reduction
n   NOPAT return on capital above cost of capital within 12 months of closing

 

Today* — Pro Forma estimate 6/30/03

 

 

13


LOGO

 

[LOGO] YELLOW® CORPORATION

 

[LOGO] ROADWAY® CORPORATION

 

Transaction terms and structure

 

Transaction value

  

n   $48 per share

n   Equity value: $961 million

n   Total enterprise value: $1.2 billion

n   Adjusted total enterprise value: $1.5 billion(1)

Consideration

  

n   50 percent cash and 50 percent Yellow stock

n   Roadway shareholders will be given a right to elect cash or stock for each share they own

n   Following election, cash and stock will be pro rata amongst shareholders (i.e. in aggregate approximately 50% stock and 50% cash)

 

(1)   Leases capitalized at 5.0x.

 

14


LOGO

 

Transaction terms and structure (cont’d)

 

[LOGO] YELLOW CORPORATION®

 

[LOGO] ROADWAY® CORPORATION

 

Value per Roadway share assuming 50% stock/50% cash consideration

 

[GRAPHIC]

 

15


LOGO

 

[LOGO] YELLOW CORPORATION®

 

[LOGO] ROADWAY® CORPORATION

 

Summary

 

n   Consistent with strategy
n   Increased scale of operations and stronger market position
n   Low risk integration strategy that will minimize lost revenues while providing significant synergies
n   Strong brand equity preserved
n   Non-asset opportunities with even larger customer base
n   Solid liquidity and leverage positions
n   Ability to generate free cash flows
  n   Even in current economic environment / upside potential
n   Achieve high confidence cost synergies (run rate)
  n   NOPAT/ROCC > WACC within 12 – 18 months

 

16


LOGO

 

[LOGO] YELLOW CORPORATION®            [LOGO] ROADWAY® CORPORATION

 

Forward looking statements

 

  n   This presentation (and oral statements made regarding the subjects of this presentation, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The words “expect,” “will,” “remain,” “estimated” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The expectations set forth in this release regarding accretion, incremental margins, economic recovery, achievement of annual savings and synergies, achievement of strong cash flow, sufficiency of cash flow to fund capital expenditures and achievement of debt reduction targets are only the parties’ expectations regarding these matters. Actual results could differ materially from these expectations depending on factors such as the combined company’s cost of capital, the ability of the combined company to identify and implement cost savings, synergies and efficiencies in the time frame needed to achieve these expectations, prior contractual commitments of the combined companies and their ability to terminate these commitments or amend, renegotiate or settle the same, the combined company’s actual capital needs, the absence of any material incident of property damage or other hazard that could affect the need to effect capital expenditures, any unforeseen merger or acquisition opportunities that could affect capital needs, the costs incurred in implementing synergies and the factors that generally effect both Yellow’s and Roadway’s respective businesses as further outlined in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in each of the companies respective Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002. Yellow’s plans regarding the maintenance of the separate Yellow and Roadway brands and networks, technology matters, service offerings, the focus on administrative and back office synergies and are only its current plans and intentions regarding these matters. Actual actions that the combined company may take may differ from time to time as the combined company may deem necessary or advisable in the best interest of the combined company and its shareholders to attempt to achieve the successful integration of the companies, the synergies needed to make the transaction a financial success and to react to the economy and the combined company’s market for its transportation services.

 

17